School Counseling Assessment Dashboard

The School Counseling Dashboard contains systematic program evaluation data as well as the aggregate assessment of student learning outcomes.

The assessment plan utilized by the Counseling Program includes multiple points throughout a student鈥檚 Plan of Study where assessment occurs; the means by which assessment occurs; the assessment measures and formats utilized; process by which remediation occurs as needed; and the means by which data is collected, analyzed, and utilized for curriculum and program improvement.

The assessment dashboard provides an opportunity for our stakeholders to review our assessment plan as well as the results of data collection and evaluation process. Data points on the assessment dashboard are updated as new data becomes available.

Vital Statistics

Between Fall 2018 and Summer 2019, there were 21 graduates of 萝莉社 University's school counseling program degree track. Our graduates have achieved a 100% pass rate on the Praxis exam for the past two years.

Between Fall 2018 and Summer 2019, 68 students were enrolled in the school counseling program degree track. Of the total number enrolled, 64 were female, 4 were male, and 0 were of undisclosed gender. Of those students enrolled, 1 identified as meeting the qualification for students with disabilities. 50 students identified ass Caucasian, 6 African-American, 8 Latinx, 0 Asian, 1 biracial or other.

Counseling Program Admission, Enrollment, and Retention

Admissions Report

Effectiveness Area Direct Data
  Academic Year
Applications Started* 25
Applications Completed 25
Applications Denied 1
Applications Accepted 24
Students Admitted 21

Academic Year 2018, G17M with CSCN

Effectiveness Area Benchmark Direct Data
Year   2018
Enrollment* Goal of the number of students admitted to the school counseling program for the academic year 15 enrolled
Retention** Benchmark was at 75% 95%
Graduation*** Benchmark was at 50% 67%
Attrition Benchmark was below 50% 5%
Course Completion Rates**** Benchmark was at or above 90% 97.8%

*Enrollment: number enrolled on census day (fall, spring & summer, student counted once for academic year)

**Retention=first graduate term was in AY2017; re-enrolled in AY2018

***Graduation=graduated in 3 years or less based on plan of study

****Course completion rates: excludes appointment courses


Academic Year 2019, G17M with CSCN

Effectiveness Area Benchmark Direct Data
Year   2019
Enrollment* Goal of the number of students admitted to the school counseling program for the academic year 27 enrolled
Retention** Benchmark was at 75% 100%
Graduation*** Benchmark was at 50% 80%
Attrition Benchmark was below 50% 0%
Course Completion Rates**** Benchmark was at or above 90% 100%

*Enrollment: Number enrolled on census day (Fall, Spring & Summer, student counted once for academic year)

**Retention: First graduate term was in Academic Year 2018; re-enrolled in Academic Year 2019

***Graduation: Graduated in 3 years or less based on plan of study

****Course completion rates: Excludes appointment courses

Annual Student Progress and Remediation Plans
 
Student Remidiation Plan Data Area 2018 2019
Number of Remediation Plans 1 0
Percentage of Students Enrolled 1% 0%
Percentage who complied with or were in the process of compying with Remediation Plan Requirements 0% 0%
Percentage who chose not to comply with Remediation Plan Requirements 0% 0%
Key Objective Assessments

Below data was collected from our previous assessment software and they did not cover all KLO assessments. However, this will be a new data point that will be implemented starting from Fall 2019 to Summer 2020. The SC assessment report for fall 2019 to summer 2020 will likely be available for review upon site visit.

Name of Assessment Standards Assessed Transition Point Conceptual Framework Proficiency/Disposition CAEP / InTASC Standard N (or score count) % Pass1
1. Praxis Test 1-10 IV PR, CTA, CKS, C A.1.1 13 100%

2.School Guidance Project

 2, 7 III HDD, CTA, C, dc A.2.2 13 100%
3.Practicum Evaluation 1-8 III PR, HDD, CTA, CKS, T, C, dl, df A.2.2 4 100%
4.Case Study 1, 3, 4, 8 III PR, HDD, CTA, CKS A.2.2 4 100%

5a. CESP 822: Assessment in Counseling

 5 III CTA A.1.3 11 100%

5b. CESP 810: Introduction to Ed Research

 5 II CKS A.1.2 36 97.2%

5c. CESP 815: Career Development

 5 III CKS A.1.4 16 100%

5d. CESP 821 Multicultural Issues in Counseling

 5 III CKS A.1.1 34 100%

6.Comprehensive Exam (CPCE)

 1-10 IV PR, CTA, CKS, dl A.1.1 13 100%

7.Counseling Foundations Final

 1 II PR, dl A.1.1 23 100%
Evaluation of Practicum and Internship
We did not have an Assessment system to store and calculate school counseling student site evaluation data before we used Tevera. Instructors manually calculated evaluation form scores based on a PDF or paper-based form submitted by practicum and internship students.
Counseling Program Comprehensive Exam (CPCE)
 
Fall 2018

萝莉社

University

 Overall
Section Mean SD Mean SD
C1: Human Growth and Development 11.5 2.4 11.5 2.7

C2: Social and Cultural Diversity		 10.6 2.3 10.1 2.5
C3: Helping Relationships

 10.9 2.1 12.2 2.6
C4: Group Work 11.0 3.0 11.1 2.6
C5: Career Development 8.3 1.8 9.4 2.7
C6: Assessment 10.3 2.1 10.8 2.3
C7: Research and Program Evaluation 9.9 3.5 11.1 3.1
C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice 8.3 3.1 11.3 2.8
Total 80.6 16.8 87.6 16.3
Spring 2019

萝莉社

University

 Overall
Section Mean SD Mean SD
C1: Human Growth and Development 12.0 5.3 12.6 2.6

C2: Social and Cultural Diversity		 10.7 3.1 11.5 2.2
C3: Helping Relationships

 14.0 1.0 13.8 1.6
C4: Group Work 14.0 1.0 12.9 1.7
C5: Career Development 9.3 1.5 10.3 2.0
C6: Assessment 9.3 1.5 10.4 2.4
C7: Research and Program Evaluation 12.0 0.0 12.1 2.0
C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice 11.3 1.2 12.1 1.6
Total 92.7 11.0 95.6 7.9
Summer 2019

萝莉社

University

 Overall
Section Mean SD Mean SD
C1: Human Growth and Development 10.0 1.4 9.1 2.5

C2: Social and Cultural Diversity		 8.0 0.0 9.3 1.8
C3: Helping Relationships

 13.0 1.4 10.2 2.3
C4: Group Work 11.5 0.7 9.6 2.5
C5: Career Development 13.5 2.1 10.1 2.3
C6: Assessment 11.5 2.1 10.1 2.3
C7: Research and Program Evaluation 10.0 1.4 10.1 2.4
C8: Professional Orientation and Ethical Practice 14.5 2.1 10.8 2.2
Total 92.0 4.2 79.3 12.2
Praxis
 
Category Mean % Correct % of Candidates Above 25th %
I. Foundations 78.5 84.6%
II. Delivery of Services 81.0 92.3%
III. Management 71.2 76.9%
IV. Acountability 74.4 76.9%
Alumni Survey

27 counseling alumni responded to this survey in 2019. Below is a brief description of the survey.

  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program prepared them to understand counseling processes, theories, and models.
  • 100% reported that the counseling program prepared them with the ability to effectively apply the basic skills of counseling.
  • 100% reported that the counseling program helped them develop a strong sense of professional identity and commitment to the counseling profession.
  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program prepared them to recognize, assess and intervene in suicide risk situations.
  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in human growth and development.
  • 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in social and cultural foundations.
  • 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in helping relationships.
  • 搂 82.1% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in group counseling.
  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in career and lifestyle development.
  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in assessment instruments and methods.
  • 92.9% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in research and program evaluation.
  • 96.4% reported that the counseling program adequately prepared them in professional orientation and ethics.
Employer Survey

 29 employers responded to this survey in 2019. Below is a brief description of the survey.

  • 96.2% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of human development across the cognitive, social and emotional areas.
  • 96.2% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities in a professional setting.
  • 93.1% reported that their employees understood and applied concepts of assessment in order to guide their professional decision making
  • 93.1% reported that their employees understood and applied ethical practices in maintaining confidentiality of student or client information.
  • 96.2% reported that their employees understood counseling processes, theories, and models.
  • 96.2% or above reported that their employees had the ability to accept constructive feedback from supervisor.
  • 96% or above reported that their employees had the ability to facilitate groups.
  • 96.2% or above reported that their employees had knowledge of community resources and the ability to determine appropriate referrals.

 

Key Professional Disposition Assessments
We did not have an Assessment system to store and calculate KPI data before we used Tevera. Instructors manually calculated KPI scores based on a paper-based scale (e.g., Counselor Competence Scale-Revised) submitted by practicum and internship students.
Candidacy Endorsements
 
Practicum Fall 2018 Spring 2019 Summer 2019
Candidacy Application 2 10 N/A
Candidacy Denied 0 0 N/A
Candidacy Endorsed 2 10 N/A
Internship Fall 2018 Spring 2019 Summer 2019
Candidacy Application 18 9 N/A
Candidacy Denied 0 0 N/A
Candidacy Endorsed 18 9 N/A
School Counseling Evaluation
We did not have an Assessment system to store and calculate school counseling practicum/internship evaluation data before we used Tevera. Instructors manually calculated evaluation form scores based on a PDF or paper-based form submitted by practicum and internship students.
Faculty to Student Ratios
 
Fall 2018 - School Counseling
 
  Campus-Based Courses Online Courses
Credits Offered 45 9
University Defined / Average Teaching Load 7.85 9.67
Faculty FTE 5.73 0.93
Student Credit Hours Produced 294 126
Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student 9 9
Student FTE 32.67 14
FTE Ratio 5.7 15.05
Core Faculty Hours 33 9
Core Faculty % Hours 73% 100%
Non-Core Faculty Hours 3 0
Non-Core Faculty % Hours 7% 0%
Adjunct Hours 9 0
Adjunct % Hours 20% 0%
Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours
Sping 2019 - School Counseling
 
  Campus-Based Courses Online Courses
Credits Offered 30 9
University Defined / Average Teaching Load 7.67 9
Faculty FTE 3.91 1
Student Credit Hours Produced 198 99
Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student 9 9
Student FTE 22 11
FTE Ratio 5.63 11
Core Faculty Hours 24 6
Core Faculty % Hours 80% 67%
Non-Core Faculty Hours 0 3
Non-Core Faculty % Hours 0% 33%
Adjunct Hours 6 0
Adjunct % Hours 20% 0%
Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours
Summer 2019 - School Counseling
 
  Campus-Based Courses Online Courses
Credits Offered 6 12
University Defined / Average Teaching Load 9 9.75
Faculty FTE .67 1.23
Student Credit Hours Produced 45 186
Unviersity Defined Full-Time Student 9 9
Student FTE 5 20.67
FTE Ratio 7.46 16.8
Core Faculty Hours 6 9
Core Faculty % Hours 100% 75%
Non-Core Faculty Hours 0 3
Non-Core Faculty % Hours 0% 25%
Adjunct Hours 0 0
Adjunct % Hours 0% 0%
Note: Adjunct*: 3-hour teaching load; Department Head**: 6 hours; Core Faculty/Non-Core Faculty: 9 hours; Clinical Faculty***: 12 hours